Talk:Little India (magazine)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Peer review request
editI think that a good peer review will help us improve this article a good bit. Arundhati lejeune 08:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Now that it is of a stub class, it means that it is a real article. However, it would need a lot of work to be done on the breadth of the article. Good checklists to use for the article are WP:WIAFA and WP:WIAGA. A key to remember is that the articles on Wikipedia (it being an encyclopedia) should assume a neutral point of view and ample referencing is encouraged for the veracity of the article.
The article, in specific, needs a proper structure like the lead section, its origins (history), the style of the magazine (features right from the editorial to the choice of articles within it), any awards that it won, any special notable features of the magazine, any special/notable columnists and so on. Maybe, an article that classifies as a publication is The Economist.
To further develop your article, you may use the article development guide. Good luck! If you have any further questions, please revert to me on my talk page. —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 06:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Do note also that, the way the article is currently written, it could easily be deleted for lack of notability (see WP:N). You need to show that the publication is notable and you can do that by fixing your citations. For example, the first sentence needs a Reliable Source to back up the claim of largest circulating publication. Later in the article, there is a reference to www.bpaww.com, the actual page (with access date) should be included as a link in the article. The same applies to the two awards mentioned in the article as well as to the claim in the last sentence (any reasonable source will do for a 'believed' type of statement). --RegentsPark (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)