Talk:List of the Pre-Roman peoples of the Iberian Peninsula

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Galicia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Galicia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Galicia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaliciaWikipedia:WikiProject GaliciaTemplate:WikiProject GaliciaGalicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Catalan-speaking countries

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Basque

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Basque Country, Basque people, Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arevaci?

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Which section of the list do the Arevaci belong in? Aristophanes68 (talk) 22:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

They were a tribe of the Celtiberian group, as such they belong to the Indo-European/Celtic group. The Ogre (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The map is wrong: at 300BC there aren't basques at south Pyrinees. More: there aren't basques at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.157.186.243 (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pre-Roman peoples of the Iberian Peninsula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of the Pre-Roman peoples of the Iberian Peninsula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040611215344/http://www.arqueotavira.com/Mapas/Iberia/Populi.htm to http://www.arqueotavira.com/Mapas/Iberia/Populi.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

El Argar

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What about El Argar? Jason Quinn (talk) 03:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

OUt-of-date material

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article suffers from the the development of the subject in the late 20th and 21 centuries. It has changed a lot. The current term is not pre-Roman but paleohispanic. That started about the turn of the century. The problem with pre-Roman is that it is not really pre-Roman. All these names come from Roman times. Don't forget, the Romans were there since they beat the Carthaginians in the Roman Republic. There is a more-or-less up-to-date database maintained by a number of universities and paid for by the government, Hesperia. I'm currently working on the topic but I can't get to every article simultaneously. The database also is a work in progress. The current sources are a kind of goulash from different stages of development. This one will take a little more study I am afraid, to know what to say. For example, the non-IE languages are not pre-IE, they are non-IE. Oh well, the whole thing is not going to be brought up to speed overnight. We'll have to chip away at it.Botteville (talk) 05:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposal

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I decided to do more on this. I propose that we rename this article to use paleohispanic rather than pre-Roman. We can do that by creating a new article, moving this material to it, and speedy deleting the old article. I would like to get your views on this.Botteville (talk) 05:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Status late May 2024

I and 2 other users have been having a go-around on 2 or 3 of these paleohispanic articles including this one. There are basically two problems, not counting the minor errors.

First of all, these articles were never finished or never finished properly. Consequently they are to a large degree incomprehensible, lacking sufficient detail to clarify the linguistic concepts. As a result they have collected tags at the top asking for specific references. These have been on there for years. No effort has been made to do the additional work.

The second problem is that while we were waiting for the first problem to be solved the field changed by quite a bit. "Pre-Roman" is being dropped in favor "Paleohispanic," as Pre-Roman does not fit the mold. What is known is mainly not pre-Roman. The failure to concede to that is systematic in many articles.

So, it is a big job. I hardly knew where to start. I made some progress up to a point. Then I was assailed by the two above-mentioned editors, who have reverted almost everything I did. Now, I can oppose reversion with referenced material. I guess they are not interested. One was very insulting making attacks ad hominem. If you've been around for a while you know the story. It is an old one. There have been many troubled articles and troubled areas on WP, most of which trouble eventually dies out, years later.

After a number of reversions and re-reversions they arrived at a consensus of 2 on an issue they call "stability." They are looking for stable articles in this area. I don't think that applies here. They are only seemingly stable because no one is addressing the problems. They are, so to speak, stably wrong. However there is a consensus of 2 I admit. I am not going to fight a consensus that deletes everything I do because it is unstable. Consensuses are hard to fight on WP even though I have the power to unrevert. I have to have some support.

My effort on this has been far-flung. There is just so much work to be done to fix it. I can't continue at that level in the face of consensual opposition. So, I'm not going to try. This is just another area where improvement is blocked by a cabal. Such an event does not mean WP is not a good encyclopedia and is not useful in a number of surprising ways. In other words, I can't make the upgrade on my own. I have confidence that sooner or later the realization of the necessity for one will become clear and a new generation will take care of it. Sooner or later everything gets addressed. I no longer have the later. What I can probably do is address small bits at time; i.e., articles of limited scope that are more easily improved. I think I will go there. There are a lot of ethnic names in this area and monuments of all sorts, also a lot of formatting to do. But, I don't have time for an effort beyond my resources. Ciao.

Add topic