Talk:List of paleoconservative organizations
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
United States Business and Industrial Council
editI can find no subtantiation for the claim that the USBIC is a paleoconservative organization. It appears to be a business-related lobby seeking a protectionist trade policy and does not take stands on issues of concern to paleoconservatives. Unless there is a rationale for keeping them on the list they should be removed.LAWinans (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Family Research Council is paleoconservative?
editSince it "supports military action against radical Islam", how can it be considered paleoconservative? Paleo's are usually opposed to military action of any kind, except defense in the aftermath of a direct attack from an established power or organization, so it being "paleoconservative" is somewhat of a misnomer IMO.
- Who knows? Since there are no sources for this article is appears that inclusion is based simply on the views of editors, aka original research. I'll start deleting unsourced entries next week. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the Family Research Council, in addition to other groups such as Accuracy in Academia and Eagle Forum do not belong in this article as they espouse social conservatism, not paleoconservatism. With regards, AnupamTalk 18:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Ludwig von Mises Institute
editI removed this Institute from this list. It is clearly Libertarian and not paleoconservative.Bastiaan1942 (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)