Talk:List of mayors of Manchester
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled
editBetween 1838-1892 Mayors did not have the title "Lord Mayor" in Manchester —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.158.20 (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
A couple of suggestions
edit- As this is a list of Manchester's Lord Mayors, would it not make sense to split off the Mayors to a separate article? Or should the article be moved to "List of Mayors of Manchester"?
- Does the "Term" column really add anything that's not already obvious from the tenure?
--Malleus Fatuorum 02:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- In answer to the first question: I don't think the article should be split. Similar Lord Mayor articles include Mayors before the title was elevated: List of Lord Mayors of London, Lord Mayor of Sheffield and Lord Mayor of Liverpool. The Austrialian articles have both titles in article name: List of Mayors and Lord Mayors of Sydney, List of mayors and lord mayors of Melbourne and List of mayors and lord mayors of Brisbane. So perhaps this article could be renamed as "List of Mayors and Lord Mayors of Manchester".
- In answer to the second question: In the past some mayors and lord mayors held the office in consecutive terms, and so the "Term" column makes this clear. However, for nearly a hundred years the office, with the exception 1947-1949, has been held by one term. So the "Term" column could be removed and any mayors and lord mayors who held the office in consecutive terms could be mentioned in the "Notes" column. -- HLE (talk) 13:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- That all seems reasonable to me, so I've renamed the article as you suggest. --Malleus Fatuorum 20:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Date of change
editIs it possible to include the date, or at least the month, when the office changes from one person to the next? Thus, if one were trying to find out who the Lord Mayor was in (say) July 1998, you would get a clear answer. The current table would leave you wondering whether it was the 1997-1998 Lord Mayor, or the 1998-1999. -Silhouettist (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Lord Mayors of Birmingham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lord Mayor of Leeds which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)