Talk:List of international cricket centuries by Gary Kirsten

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured listList of international cricket centuries by Gary Kirsten is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2013Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 17, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gary Kirsten's 275 against England is the second longest innings in the history of Test cricket, lasting for almost 14 hours?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of international cricket centuries by Gary Kirsten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply