This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The article needs a re-write. Publishing a alphabetical list of forts does not project importance of the topic or justify its historical imporatance. It would be nice if there is some historical data (style, strategic importance, classification of forts, historical events) put up for the topic. Maharastra has too many forts a list of which should be maintained but this also means they need to be classfied in some manner to project importance of the subject --Kedar (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I disagree. This is just the list, alphabetically sorted: mostly this is to get a "state of the Wikipedia" on forts in Maharashtra. In this way, it is analogous to List of object-oriented programming terms. Adding any more information will be a massive amount of work, which I don't think makes sense at the moment - once we have more articles on these forts, we can think about forts sorted by district, forts on a clickable maps, and so on. What do you think? -- Gaurav (talk) 04:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the idea that there should be more information about the forts, not just a plain list.
People may want to get small, quick information a this doesn't do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.37.167 (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Forts for which there is information have links to articles. Even "small quick" referenced info is hard to find about most of the minor forts. Please help us to contribute to the topic. ----Belasd (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
