Talk:List of city squares

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would probably be more useful to list the squares by city. Lee M 01:58, 17 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

done. this addition recommends a table format. Badanedwa 05:34, May 18, 2004 (UTC)

Automation

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi guys, couldn't this list be automatically generated by means of the article category? --Gennaro Prota 00:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Prominent?

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would be nice to know why a particular square is prominent. Otherwise it's just a list of squares that someone bothered to add. --Romanski 20:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is probably impossible to set definite criteria for "prominent" but here an approach:

The square should be significant beyond the limits of the city, for example for its:
- artistic significance, i.e. Piazza del Campo, Siena
- historic significance (place of demonstrations, revolutions, etc.) i.e.Tian'anmen Square, University Square, Bucharest
- economic or representative significance, (place for regional markets, location of state institutions).
- touristic destination, i.e. Piazza del Duomo, Milan
The square should be assessed as significant or often quoted in:
- academic journals of urban sociology, urban design, architecture, landscape architecture or other;
- history publications (other than local history);

In the same time there should be excluded from the list city squares of only local significance, such as neighborhood squares. Elekhh (talk) 06:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Presumably squares should be located in cities too, rather than towns, despite the fact the Wikilink links to Town square? There are several towns listed at the moment! Also, in reference to significance (above), it would seem anything that is redlinked cannot be all that significant or notable. Sionk (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Particular listings

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not sure why Sugar Land Town Square is listed. It's not a plaza or square - it's a privately owned shopping development. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.38.255.88 (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Format

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

A large number of different formats have developed since the article was created in 2006. The original format of the article seemed to be

Somewhere Else, Another Place, St Elsewhere - Prague

As opposed to the alternative style which has crept in e.g.

Somewhere Else - Prague
Another Place - Prague
St Elsewhere - Prague

i.e. the original style was space saving, no need for a separate line for each square, even if there are a number of notable squares in the same city.
In my view it would be better to make the list style consistent. Any preferences for one style or the other? Sionk (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

We also have lists ordered alphabetically by name of city, alphabetically by name of square, or completely randomly ordered! Sionk (talk) 22:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on List of city squares. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic