Talk:List of chemical process simulators
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Improving the list
editIMHO, this list should be improved rather than deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.218.125 (talk) 03:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Instead of just listing chemical process simulators it would be beneficial to see for which purpose they have been developed and how they have evolved over time. Any suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.23.69.3 (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- I modified the list into a table, so for each software we can indicate clearly the purpose of the software and other information. Regarding the evolution over time of each software (e.g. date of introduction, actual version, etc.), I suggest to use the specific page of each software, otherwise the list will become too much confused.
- I also suggested to split the page in two, because mathematical modelling software are not specifically built as process simulation software. For example we can use gPROMS to simulate a process, but to do it we need to model each equipment of the process, instead a process simulation software has this model yet implemented, so the approaches to these two types of software and the graphical user interfaces are completely different.
- In the list there are furthermore other software that are related to process simulation but are not process simulator, so we need to delete these ones or to put them into another section as "Software related to process simulation". --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 02:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Elements removed
editI removed these software from the list because I think they are not proper chemical process simulators (that is they belong to different software typologies):
- COMSOL Multiphysics - It is a suite essential to model equipment through finite element methods and similar
- ASCEND - Mathematical modelling. Solving systems of non-linear differential/algebraic equations, linear and nonlinear optimisation
- Aspen Custom Modeler - Modelling of process equipment
- EcosimPro - Modelling systems represented by differential-algebraic equations or ordinary-differential equations and discrete events
- gPROMS - Mathematical modelling
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of chemical process simulators. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140315042115/http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kogt/offerings/software/assett/ to http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kogt/offerings/software/assett/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140315044150/http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kogt/offerings/software/k-spice/ to http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kogt/offerings/software/k-spice/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716093320/http://smartprocedures.com/distillation_expert to http://smartprocedures.com/distillation_expert
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)