Talk:List of Old Wykehamists

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Godtres in topic Henry Chichele
Featured listList of Old Wykehamists is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on September 21, 2020.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2020Featured list candidatePromoted

In fiction

edit

The article has long had a detailed (and to my mind interesting and informative) In fiction section, written by a long-departed editor. However, the material was mainly cited only to the primary sources, i.e. the fiction books themselves. Another editor has seen fit to remove all of that, leaving the section as a somewhat inviable rump. I suspect that primary sourcing is not exactly wrong in this situation, but obviously reliable secondary sources would make the material indisputable. For now, I'm putting the table here, in the hope that someone will take up the challenge of restoring the material and citing it to modern standards. Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fictional Wykehamists
Character Author Work Date Notes
Antrobus Lawrence Durrell Antrobus Complete 1985 Sabben-Clare wonders if Durrell knew of Sir Reginald Antrobus, Crown Agent for the Colonies 1909–1918.[1]
Sir Humphrey Appleby Yes Minister TV series 1980–1984
Francis Arabin Anthony Trollope Barchester Towers 1857
James Arrowby Iris Murdoch The Sea, The Sea 1978
Edward Ashburnham Ford Madox Ford The Good Soldier 1915
William Beckwith Alan Hollinghurst The Swimming Pool Library 1988
Captain Edward Bentinck-Boyle Colditz (TV series) 1972–74 Played by Neil Stacy. He catches out a German planted among the prisoners who claimed to be an Old Wykehamist but didn't know his "Notions".
George Bertram Anthony Trollope The Bertrams 1859 "a commoner", "stood forth to spout out the Latin hexameters, and to receive the golden medal" (page 12)
Marmaduke Branscombe Mortimer Collins Sweet Anne Page 1868
Richard Carstone Charles Dickens Bleak House 1852–1853
Collins Evelyn Waugh Brideshead Revisited 1945 "an embryo don ... a man of solid reading and childlike humour." In the television series, Charles Ryder is shown wearing an Old Wykehamist tie.
Lieutenant Comber George MacDonald Fraser Flash for Freedom 1971
Tim Cranmer John le Carré Our Game 1995
Josiah Crawley Anthony Trollope Framley Parsonage and The Last Chronicle of Barset 1861 Not explicitly mentioned as a Wykehamist, but Francis Arabin refers to Crawley having been "at school and at college" with him.
Christopher Dysart Somerville and Ross The Real Charlotte 1894
Claude Erskine-Browne (and several minor characters) John Mortimer Rumpole of the Bailey series 1975–1992
Basil Fawlty John Cleese Fawlty Towers TV series 1975–1979 Basil wears an OW tie[2]
Sinclair Hammond P. G. Wodehouse Bill the Conqueror 1924
Peter Hithersay Nicholas Shakespeare "Snowleg" 2004
Mycroft Holmes Brian Freemantle The Holmes Inheritance 2004 Brother of Sherlock Holmes
Sebastian Holmes Brian Freemantle The Holmes Inheritance 2004 Son of Sherlock Holmes
"I" (AKA Marwood) Bruce Robinson Withnail and I 1987 Identified as having gone to "The other place", by Withnail to Uncle Monty, who says "Ah, a Wykehamist".
Alroy Keir W. Somerset Maugham Cakes and Ale 1930
A. V. Laider Max Beerbohm Seven Men (and two others) 1919 Possibly: he says "I was at Winchester with Blake", but the point of the story is that he was a pathological liar.
Dexter Mayhew One Day David Nicholls 2009 novel, 2011 film
General Melchett Blackadder Goes Forth 1989 Portrayed by Stephen Fry
Merlyn T. H. White The Sword in the Stone 1938 Among his extraordinary list of possessions was a gold medal for being the best scholar at Winchester (in an earlier edition, at Eton).
Charles Nantwich Alan Hollinghurst The Swimming Pool Library 1988
Edgar Naylor Cyril Connolly The Rock Pool 1936
Odoreida Stephen Potter Lifemanship books 1950–1970
Larry Pettifer and his controller Tim Cranmer John le Carré Our Game 1995
Peregrine Pickle Tobias Smollett The Adventures of Peregrine Pickle 1751 "Before he had been a full year at Winchester, he had signallized himself in so many achievements, in defiance to the laws and regulations of the place, that he was looked upon with admiration, and actually chosen dux, or leader, by a large body of his contemporaries." (Chapter 16)
Mr Ramsey Tobias Wolff Old School 2003
Freddie Rooke P. G. Wodehouse Jill the Reckless 1920
Captain Sender Ian Fleming The Living Daylights 1966
Dr Spacely-Trellis Peter Simple 1957 onwards The go-ahead bishop of Bevindon
Rupert Willem von Starnberg ("Bill") George MacDonald Fraser Flashman and the Tiger ("The Road to Charing Cross") 1999
Sir Derek Underhill P. G. Wodehouse Jill the Reckless 1920
Arthur Wilkinson Anthony Trollope The Bertrams 1859 "in the college [House]" (page 12)

References

  1. ^ Sabben-Clare, 1981. p. 178
  2. ^ Tegner, W. (June 2006). "All from the Same Place?". The Trusty Servant. 101. Winchester College: 5. Archived from the original on February 6, 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

As the "long-departed" editor in question, I must say that I do not see the reason for applying the "secondary sources" rule in this context. OK, for history, the point is that primary sources may be wrong and secondary sources are needed to sort them out. But if the very proposition we are establishing is that "primary source X says Y", surely the primary source is sufficient: if Trollope's Barchester Towers says that Francis Arabin was at Winchester, how can you possibly say that Trollope thought that Arabin was a fictional OW but could be wrong, so that we need secondary confirmation? The whole thing is only the product of Trollope's brain! Also, I do not understand by what principle the later editor left in the few examples that he did.

I would favour putting the whole list back; though we may need page references to the novels in question. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 10:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'd very much like to see the list back, but I agree that (at the least) we require exact page references, preferably supported by a direct quotation in each case. I'd have thought this although primary quite sufficient for an entry in a table or list: it's not as if we're writing an entire article on each item. Of course, if we can locate a few more secondary sources, or even better one good one that covers a dozen or so of the table entries, that would be helpful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Well, in the absence of progress, I guess you're right, there's no special reason to retain the rump list; and perhaps the fictional list belongs in a separate article, not here, though again it would need at least a bit more sourcing to save it from deletion. A complete list of primary sources would I think be easily enough for that purpose, though a few secondary sources would guarantee its safety. I shall remove the rump from the article now, and suggest that if anyone would like to work on it, they do so in their sandbox and then launch it as a separate article, with a "See also" link from here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's taken until a rainy day in November to sort this out, but I've today created Winchester College in fiction which includes, extends, and substantially cites the table from here. There are more entries to cite, if anybody is so minded ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Robert Vane Russell

edit

Robert Vane Russell attended but I'm not sure for how long - I'd guess he should be in the 1880s decade section but if anyone can clarify that would be great, thanks. - Sitush (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page name

edit

Hi. I was curious if anyone ever brought up whether the name of this page should really be called List of Old Wykehamists? I'm not sure what the alternative would be, but List of notable former pupils of Winchester College or similar might be more descriptive. "Old Wykehamist" as a term only has 5.5k non-Wiki hits and interestingly, one of the two sources in the intro used to cite the term's use (here) explicitly calls it out as "jargonistic". Just wondered while passing through, and I won't exactly be knocking at FLRC to have changes made to this impressively-researched page. Steve T • C 21:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for the thoughts, and the kind words. The term may not have many online hits (why would it) but is actually quite widely used in printed sources of different kinds, from novels to politics and sport. The question of whether we shouldn't have a word like 'distinguished' in the title is another matter, and would have some justification. And I've replaced the source. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Further culling?

edit

Peter Scott and Roger Winlaw are a couple of names I chanced upon that don't seem to me quite to match the criteria for inclusion given in the lead (national recognition, top of profession). One played cricket for Oxford University and twice earned the MC in the war, the other had 9 games with Surrey. So if we include them, I suspect that others deserve mention. Chiswick Chap wrote that he already culled scores of names at the time of the FA assessment, so I am reluctant to be bold without bringing this up here. Should we remove such entries or modify the criteria? Or should we live with some inconsistency so as to advertise the odd interesting story? In any case I would defend applying editorial discretion rather than setting too rigorous rules: some professions are less formally assessed than others, and some of significance have died young before anyone had a chance to honour them. Jmchutchinson (talk) 10:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think they should be culled. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Titles and honorifics

edit

The plain intention on this page has for several years, and all through the long formal review process, has been to present the information as plainly as possible. Titles like "Sir" and post-nominals like "KCMG" are not used. They add nothing to the list of people concerned; anyone interested can follow the links to the articles concerned, or indeed to the cited sources, to read more. The entry for each individual here states their name, their profession and indicates as briefly as possible their practical achievement, that's all. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:28, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Henry Chichele

edit

Whilst many sources claim that Chichele studied at Winchester College, I dispute this claim. He studied in Winchester under Wykeham from 1373 and progressed to Oxford around 1379. However, the college was founded in 1382, operational in 1394. Perhaps there is a source that explains this discrepancy. Otherwise, an explanatory footnote will suffice (under Wykeham in Winchester, but not "Winchester College"). Godtres (talk) 20:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's disputable. I think we should say something like that "it has often been claimed that", and perhaps footnote it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good! Godtres (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply