Talk:List of Inuyasha characters

In-universe style

I frankly do not know why this was tagged as an "issue", as it makes perfect sense to speak from the world of the characters you describe when you want to convey their backstory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8480:499B:510C:FF4A:DC86:8837 (talk) 06:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Jinenji & kagome?

Where did the person who wrote jinenji's profile get the idea that he likes kagome? It's never shown in the episode at all! just... where did you get that from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8480:499B:510C:FF4A:DC86:8837 (talk) 06:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Inuyasha characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915071659/http://animage.jp/index2.html to http://animage.jp/index2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090408093934/http://animage.jp/gp/gp_2002.html to http://animage.jp/gp/gp_2002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Uncited original research

This is pretty much the most uncited original research I have seen in one article on Wikipedia. It needs to be sourced, or blown up. Additionally twitter seems to be frequently used as a source. --- Possibly ☎ 05:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I don't think deletion is a good idea, since this is clearly a worthy WP:SIZESPLIT, though I don't disagree on the original research. Link20XX (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, the article has a lot of issues, but I don't think that it should be deleted. About citing Twitter, I don't think that is a major issue, since those sources mainly cite the own voice actors accounts, but if there are better reliable secondary sources which can confirm they participation, it's preferable to use them. My main concern, however, is the way they were cited, but I will try to fix it. - Xexerss (talk) 05:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Maybe I used the wrong shortcut there. I didn't mean delete the article, I meant delete the current content down to what is verifiable. This is basically a long fan essay at the moment. --- Possibly ☎ 06:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I trimmed the last five sections. Much better, but they too need sources. --- Possibly ☎ 06:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I agree, there's a lot of long and unnecessary content. - Xexerss (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm not that interested int his article, just wanted to point out the problem. Unwatching. I wish you all well in the rescue. --- Possibly ☎ 06:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

BTW, I confused WP:BLOWITUP with the deletion of the article. That was my bad. - Xexerss (talk) 06:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I can tried to source the information but I don’t know how to cite them well. FedualJapan (talk) 05:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)