Talk:List of Australian Football League grounds

Former FLCList of Australian Football League grounds is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 1, 2008Featured list candidateNot promoted

Untitled

edit

This either needs to be renamed List of Australian Football League grounds or needs to be re-written to label all the current sections Current Major AFL, Current Minor AFL etc and include WAFL, SANFL etc grounds. Australian rules football does not equal AFL. The-Pope 15:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes. To me the former option seems better, as that name defines a well defined list. JPD (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

edit

Responding on a request here I'm making a few comments. First the good:

  • This list is clear, well-defined and well organized. There are lots of descriptions, explanations and pictures that put the information into context and make the list an interesting read. I think this definitely has the potential to be a featured list.

Now the bad:

  • It needs to be better sourced. I can see just four references, and there are entire paragraphs and sections that aren't supported by a single in-line citation.
  • The prose in a few places is a bit clunky and awkward. I've had a go at tweaking some of it, but writing brilliant prose is a talent I just don't have.

All in all, a fine bit of work, but not FL standard yet. It can definitely get there though. Reyk YO! 03:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


The major problem is still with the sourcing. Finding references for the ground capacities is a good start, but there are still too many unsupported statements. I'll give some examples:

  • The MCG is the only ground that has been in use since the beginning of the VFL/AFL
  • TIO Stadium is the newest AFL venue
  • The Prince of Wales and the Portuguese King being there at the exhibition match in 1969.

These all need citations- you need to provide a reference everywhere a statement is made.

I'd also go over the sources you already have. Some of them are incomplete. There's one that says "Anon, 1916", and another that just says "Herald Sun". If I wanted to refer to those sources I'd have no idea how to find them. You're already using citation templates, you need to fill out every field that you possibly can. This is likely to be a tedious chore, but it's necessary to bring this up to FL standard. Reyk YO! 03:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some of these sentences are "sky is blue" statements. Nick carson (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Capacity

edit

Windy Hill had a capacity of over 15,000! As you can see by it's record crowd of over 40,000, It holds roughly that now.. Aaroncrick (talk) 07:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Stadium naming convention?

edit

I propose that we return to naming stadiums by their actual names, not their commercial names. We simply can't continue to use the commercial names of stadia. They change too often and they conflict with WP policy. We need to take the same stance the ABC does with commercial naming. Football Park, Kardinia Park, The Glasshouse, Docklands Stadium, Stadium Australia, etc, are what we should be referring to these stadia as. Also from an organisational point of view, it makes no sense changing the names of stadia with the commings and goings of commercial naming rights. This was decided on a couple of years ago but somehow it's lazily been let slide. Nick carson (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Olympic Stadium / Motordrome

edit

According to this list, Olympic Stadium was used by Melbourne for three games in 1932. But according to Olympic Stadium, Melbourne the venue was opened in 1956. Can someone clarify? Reyk YO! 04:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Australian Football League grounds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Australian Football League grounds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply