Talk:Letitia James
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DoB
edit- "Letitia James Lehman College 1981, City Councilmember, Brooklyn." [1]
Hence "(born c. 1960)"
--Jerzy•t 14:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Section That Keeps Getting Taken Out By Biased Editor Rms125a@hotmail.com
edit"In 2005, Letitia James became very involved in advocating for her community's needs in regard to the proposed Brooklyn Nets Arena in her district. Going against Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Borough President Marty Markowitz and developer Bruce Ratner," --71.167.144.190 (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's right. I did trim the article to the essentials, and removed POV text and name dropping. As far as "advocating for her community's needs", read Bertha Lewis's comment re James, which I did not insert or add to the article, but found fascinating. I really would like to know what agenda this IP editor has and if he/she is a staffer or other interested party in James' political life and campaigns. Guess we'll never know.Quis separabit? 17:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Rms, you didn't address the issue about the the above-quoted. I'm putting it back in.--69.2.120.11 (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- I further removed the Bertha Lewis quote since it went against NPOV. She's still in there but it's really not clear what she's up to these days so such a quote seems less important. Besides, Ratner's company is nowhere near building any of that affordable housing for the project yet.--100.2.222.219 (talk) 16:29, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Letitia James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005082244/http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Fpolitics&id=9268206 to http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news%2Fpolitics&id=9268206
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Letitia James. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060448/http://wccny.org/2012/03/20/april-23-lunch-with-legislators-councilmember-letitia-james/ to http://wccny.org/2012/03/20/april-23-lunch-with-legislators-councilmember-letitia-james/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Brooklyn vs. New York City
editJesseRafe, I'm looking at Template:Infobox person which lays out city, administrative region, country as the standard for denoting locations. Brooklyn, New York seems to me misleading because it looks like its a city in New York. For example we say someone is from Delhi, India, not *insert on of the 11 districts of the city*, India. This is the difference between my edit and your reversion:
- James was born in Brooklyn, New York. (your reversion)
- James was born in the Brooklyn borough of New York City, New York. (mine)
You wrote in your edit history "the MOS and standards, it's commonly called "Brooklyn". Can you please link the policy you are referring to so I can read it? Thanks. LivinRealGüd (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is an intentionally false narrative, as can clearly be seen in my edit summaries my issue was you rewrote the passage to say the needlessly wordy "Brooklyn borough of New York City, New York City" which is clearly silly and unencylopedic and wholly different "from borough of New York City, New York" which you claim, but is still not good. The common name is "Brooklyn, New York" a full 2/3 words shorter and much more to the point. The idea that "the more words one writes the more authoritative" does not equal better writing. That aside, it is the standard to just use the WP:COMMONNAME almost everywhere, and deference is given to NYC boroughs as an almost city-level toponym in this article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Northern America and the Caribbean, which is not about this precisely, but illustrative of the fact that they can stand alone, such as in article titles. Lastly, WP:IFITAINTBROKE holds too. JesseRafe (talk) 22:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, there is no "intentionally false narrative", I was quoting you from right here. My "idea" is that the more accurate words are they more authoritative they are. Before I got to this page I found her infobox displaying "Brooklyn, New York" as if Brooklyn was a city. I am willing to bet an editor saw your edit of "Brooklyn, New York" and thought that it was a city. In infoboxes you write "New York City, New York, U.S." no matter where you come from in New York City. WP:COMMONNAME is under Wikipedia:Article titles, and it is a guideline for Article Titles. You are right in saying deference is given to NYC boroughs, when its relating to neighborhoods not cities. To quote directly: "Neighborhoods within New York City are identified by the standard [neighborhood, borough], where "borough" is one of the five boroughs ..." Lastly, WP:IFITAINTBROKE, does indeed hold true: "... if something is slightly broken in a way that you care about, and fixing it improves the encyclopedia a little, then feel free to fix it." I'm honestly not trying to be a thorn in the side, I'm just trying to make it a little better. I propose the following:
- James was born in the Brooklyn borough of New York City, New York.
- Let me know what you think. LivinRealGüd (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, there is no "intentionally false narrative", I was quoting you from right here. My "idea" is that the more accurate words are they more authoritative they are. Before I got to this page I found her infobox displaying "Brooklyn, New York" as if Brooklyn was a city. I am willing to bet an editor saw your edit of "Brooklyn, New York" and thought that it was a city. In infoboxes you write "New York City, New York, U.S." no matter where you come from in New York City. WP:COMMONNAME is under Wikipedia:Article titles, and it is a guideline for Article Titles. You are right in saying deference is given to NYC boroughs, when its relating to neighborhoods not cities. To quote directly: "Neighborhoods within New York City are identified by the standard [neighborhood, borough], where "borough" is one of the five boroughs ..." Lastly, WP:IFITAINTBROKE, does indeed hold true: "... if something is slightly broken in a way that you care about, and fixing it improves the encyclopedia a little, then feel free to fix it." I'm honestly not trying to be a thorn in the side, I'm just trying to make it a little better. I propose the following: