Talk:Lerwick

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Finn Bjørklid in topic Distance to Oslo - must be wrong

I'm not a linguist but, it seems to be that the name Lerwick is more correctly related to Old Norse or Norn than the modern Norwegian language, so I'm about to edit the link. If someone knows better, great.

Chaikney 16:09, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


The name means 'muddy bay' and it is old norse.

Distance to Oslo - must be wrong

edit

Lerwick can't possibly be 350 miles away from Oslo. If you go that distance west from Oslo, you approximately reach Bergen. Could it be that Bergen is in fact the city which is meant here? --Barend 19:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Distance to Oslo is not really that relevant, if history matter. Bergen was the old capital of Norway. By sea og by air is 222.57 mi (358.20 km), jf. Distance Lerwick → Bergen --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tourism section

edit

This section deals with areas mainly outside Lerwick and is written entirely in the first person. I suggest it is rewritten in an encyclopaedic style and the geographic area is limited to Lerwick Stumpfoot (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Deleted Tourism section for the above reasons Stumpfoot (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pronounciation

edit

How is Lerwick pronounced? Is the 'w' silent in Scottish place names as in many/most English ones e.g. Har(w)ich, Green(w)ich, Flit(w)ick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.251.209 (talk) 11:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


In Shetland, and even within Lerwick, there is no accepted right or wrong pronunciation, unlike the examples you give above. The most common pronunciations are variations on Lerwick, Lerick, Lerook and Larook, depending on the local dialect of the speaker. Lerick is probably the most common pronounciation by 'Lerwigians' Stumpfoot (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

For what it's worth, the BBC usage in the Shipping Forecast is Lerwick... Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Distance to Aberdeen

edit

The distance to Aberdeen has twice been changed without explanation from 210 miles to 184 miles. Using the grid references from their respective articles (Lerwick: grid reference HU474414; and Aberdeen: grid reference NJ925065), I calculate the straight-line distance to be about 339km, which agrees with the figure of 210 miles. Please don't change it again without explanation. Thanks. --Deskford (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Para removed

edit

I deleted the following from the "Culture" section:

Recently there has been an increase in antisocial behaviour due to local uptake of British yob culture as well as an influx of troublemakers from elsewhere including drug traffickers. These people (mainly youths) have caused an upsurge in crime in the area that shows no signs of going away.

This bit was entirely unreferenced, was a long way from being NPOV and sweeping in its generalisations -- "troublemakers from elsewhere", "mainly youths", etc. Loganberry (Talk) 04:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lerwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lerwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Old norn name

edit

Norn is a poorly documentet language, or maybe more a correctly a dialect of norse. Are there any possible referance to the place name in norn? Finn Bjørklid (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply