Talk:Lee M. Hollander

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review

Thank you

edit

Thank you for re-creating this page. Unfortunately it was AfD'd when I first created it. I was new to Wikipedia, and was one of the first pages I tried creating. His work is very important to 20th century academic studies on Norse/North Germanic literature, when the topic was being highly bastardized by political psuedo-history. JanderVK (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lee M. Hollander/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 00:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 


Lead

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • A concise lead, inclusive of achievements.

Early life and education

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Well laid out leading up to award of Ph.D

Early Career

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • He seems to have been very well placed on his Scandinavian journey.
  • Most certainly this time oversea in University libraries, etc, led to a strong foundation for his future.

University of Texas at Austin

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Have to say, this is very well researched and put together!
  • Elegant scribing, leads you on to enjoying more.

Death and legacy

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Succinct.

Personal Life

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Noted.

Selected Works

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Noted.

See Also

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • All appropriate. Philologists, researchers in ancient languages and mentioned in article.

References

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Noted.

Sources

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Noted.

Further Reading

edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • Polomé honoured the works of Hollander.
edit
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  • 694 downloads of his works on Project Gutenberg.


 


End Matter

edit
  1. Is it is Broad in its coverage?
  • Yes, and the section on Hollander's time at the University of Texas at Austin lays out the works and achievements of this Germanic, Scandinavian and Old Norse scholar.
  1. Is it Verifiable with no original research?
  • Yes, no original research is noted.
  1. Does it follow WP:NPOV Neutral Point of View?
  • Yes, a neutral portrayal of the life and works of Lee M. Hollander is given
  1. Is it stable?
  • This page started life on 9 December 2012;
  • There have been 49 edits to the page in total;
  • 302 page views in the last 60 days;
  • 143 links from this page and 28 external links;
  • No evidence of edit warring, etc.
  1. Top editors are
    * Krakkos
    * Yngvadottir
    * Dsp13
    * Doremo 
    * Ser Amantio di Nicolao
   
  1. It is illustrated by images ?
  • There are no free images of Lee M. Hollander available; an image from newspaper.com is used under fair use policy; accepted. The image has considerable moire (its dotty) and merits a dose of Gaussian blur to remove same.
  • The Royal Mounds of Uppsala is included under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. An appropriate image as events are included at this location in Old Norse.
  • The Sjörup Runestone ~ the copyright holder of this work, released this work into the public domain; related to the writings of Hollander.

Overall

edit
  • A most readable article, well resourced.

Conclusion

edit