Talk:Lawrence Cannon
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deputy Prime Minister
editWhat is the source? I haven't heard that.
- The position of DPM of Canada, is not a statutory office. When no one is given the title, it simply doesn't exist. Further more claiming Cannon is de-facto DPM, is inaccurate for a DPM isn't automatically first in line to the Prime-Minister duties. The PM or the governing Party decides that issue. Therefore, Cannon shouldn't be listed as de-facto DPM of Canada. GoodDay 20:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Right and wrong I believe. First I agree with GoodDay that Cannon shouldn't be listed as the de facto Prime Minister. But this is because, de facto implies that the role is played in practice not in law. But in fact by law, due to an order-in-council on recomendation of the PM, Lawrence Cannon, would play the role of Prime Minister if Harper was somehow incapacitated, and the party or caucus did not have time to change the order. It is more like Cannon, is the unnamed Deputy Prime Minister. In addition I think some might argue the real de facto, as in, in practice, Deputy Prime Minister, is Jim Prentice who is probably Harper's most trusted minister and is the chair of two cabinet committees. Without some kind of authoratative source on this issue Cannon probably shouldn't be listed as the de facto Deputy Prime Minister.1130130 21:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Red Toryism is not simply "Fiscal conservatism and Social liberalism", it is a complex combination of (usually english-)Canadian nationalism, protectionism, and typically associated with its own brand of Christian conservatism similar to that of Latin American christian democratic parties. Fiscal conservatism and Social liberalism barely coincide, if not are the complete opposites of what it means to be a Red Tory. Think of it this way, Stanfield was the ideal Red Tory, Brian Mulroney was the complete opposite.--69.214.190.89 22:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Furthermore 'he is very liberal' ?!? according to what benchmark. Supporting same-sex marriage is nearly socially centerist in this day and age.Simonm223 (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Deputy Leader of the Conservative Party
editDoes Cannon hold this party position? I know Peter MacKay once did (before the 2006 Election). GoodDay (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Geneaology?
editCannon can't be the great-grandson of Sir Charles Fitzpatrick. It was his great-uncle Lawrence Arthur Cannon, Supreme Court Justice, who married Mary Fitzpatrick, the daughter of Charles. There's no direct lineage between Fitzpatrick and the current Lawrence Cannon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.132.181.96 (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Dr?
editUmm... why does the page put Dr in front of his name? He holds a BA and MBA (see http://www.lawrencecannon.com/about_lawrence/), neither of which would entitle him to Dr.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Lawrence Cannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060925034915/http://www.tc.gc.ca/aboutus/crowncorporations.htm to http://www.tc.gc.ca/aboutus/crowncorporations.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)