Las Vegas Lights FC has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 26, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Las Vegas may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Las Vegas Lights FC appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 July 2018, and was viewed approximately 3,456 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Las Vegas Lights FC/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I'll have a look at this, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Initial review
Infobox
edit- I notice general manager has two capital letters but head coach has lower case for the coach part. I'd say manager should probably lose the capital letter.
- Fixed.
Lead
edit- Las Vegas Lights FC are an American professional soccer team", I think it's standard for is to be used instead of are when referring to a football team.
- Fixed.
- "Nevada club who also play in USL", should this be "in the USL"? Otherwise it's saying, play in United Soccer League. (If this is correct, then there may be further changes through the article required with the same issue).
- Fixed this instance and a few others.
History
edit- "to call Las Vegas home", comes across a little informal. Perhpas "to be based in Las Vegas" or something similar?
- Fixed.
- "terminated by the league after their first season", what was the reason for this?
- Added "financial issues", as the newspaper source is rather vague.
- Link exhibition matches to Exhibition game.
- Done.
Inaugural season
edit- Link Liga MX.
- Done.
Stadium
edit- Unlink Downtown Las Vegas. Per WP:OVERLINK, links should generally only appear once in the text.
- Done.
Club badge and jersey
edit- "The club's jerseys are manufactured by BLK and including logos of sponsors", including > include.
- Fixed.
Ownership and management
edit- Unlink Liga MX here as it should now be linked in the first mention further up.
- Done.
- Unlink Chelis, also previously linked previously.
- Done.
Club culture
edit- Silver State Cup is red linked. WP:REDLINK states that red links should only really be included for articles that are likely to meet notability requirements to encourage creation. As this is the rivalry of two teams, one of which is in its first season, I would be surprised if this would be notable enough.
- Done.
First-team squad
edit- Same red link issue with Thomas Olsen in the squad list, if he doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL then he shouldn't be linked.
- Done.
References
edit- No issues here, formatted immaculately.
External links
edit- On a side note, is the club template really necessary? It only has a link to the club's ground.
- It also has a link to the season and will likely grow in upcoming years.
Not much to really change really, article is well written and referenced. A few minor issues, placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Kosack: All addressed. To be honest, I thought that this would be picked up much later, with time for me to write up an end-of-season summary. I will have to go back and do so in October. SounderBruce 21:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have no further concerns over the article, it meets the relevant GA criteria. A nice piece of work, promoting. Kosack (talk) 11:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)