Talk:Larry Glick

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Larry Glick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://popup.lala.com/popup/1657887660458417358
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100405055544/http://www.massbroadcastershof.org/hof_larry_glick.htm to http://www.massbroadcastershof.org/hof_larry_glick.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615063646/http://hollywoodlog.typepad.com/nickerblog/2005/04/glick_universit.html to http://hollywoodlog.typepad.com/nickerblog/2005/04/glick_universit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Larry Glick facebook group

There is a Larry Glick facebook group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/159726025584/?ref=share . Does someone want / know how to post it to the Main Article page? (Does it need the "/?ref=share" part or not?) Thank you. AdderUser (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Goes against house style

Due respect to the man, but this reads like someone's eulogy. Perhaps someone who knew of the person's achievements without being related to him could give this a go?2600:6C56:6400:195:ED78:BF76:CD92:4138 (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)