@ThePieMaster51: The title Laid-Back Camp: The Movie by Crunchyroll is already added as a note in the article. I support sticking with Laid-Back Camp Movie due to (I hope you read the source cited in the article) them using "Eiga" (movie) instead of "Gekijōban" (the movie) and there is a reason for that, which is already covered in the Production section. Starting this discussion to avoid edit warring. Centcom08 (talk) 14:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
- For the time being, I'll support the page remaining at Laid-Back Camp Movie for the time being because after review, it is most often referred to as such in English news reports. That being said, I think a move to Laid-Back Camp The Movie should still be re-examined following the English release as I think it's possible if not likely that it becomes the majority use title. User:ThePieMaster51 (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @ThePieMaster51: Extracting from the article:
Tōyama revealed that the film used "movie" (映画, eiga) instead of "the movie" (劇場版, gekijōban) in the title so that viewers could "enjoy the [film] as a stand-alone work, not as a [film] that can only be enjoyed by those who have seen the TV series."
The film is from Japan so if they laid it out as "movie" instead of "the movie" in the title then so be it. The film first released in Japan has already an English subtitle as Yuru Camp Movie, not Yuru Camp: The Movie. The title that Crunchyroll licensed is sufficient as a note. Centcom08 (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
