Talk:La Di Da Di

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Cappella Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject A Cappella, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of a cappella (professional and collegiate) and related articles such as its groups, recordings, institutions, and public figures on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.A CappellaWikipedia:WikiProject A CappellaTemplate:WikiProject A CappellaA Cappella articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Decency

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm going to try to edit this article to at least make it look decent. Matt Traywick 03:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

[1] Some of these are notable, but most are not. If there have been third party publications written about some of these references then by all means include them, with said sources in a prose format. JBsupreme (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on La Di Da Di. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140716124359/https://soundcloud.com/redfoo/lets-get-ridiculous to https://soundcloud.com/redfoo/lets-get-ridiculous

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

What to do about the Legacy section

Latest comment: 26 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The excessive list of songs that have sampled and/or referenced this song (many of which are not referenced, some of which seem like stretches) looks to have been a problem since early on in this article's existence. Surely the body of the article should be more substantial than a list of other songs.

I'm not sure what should be done, though - should the references be excised completely in favor of songs that have only sampled the song? Should it be split into its own, more structured article? I definitely think the other sections need more information. I know The Rap Year Book has a chapter on "La Di Da Di," and I think a song as important as this one should have some scholarly or thinkpiece writings lying around. FreeChurros (talk) 05:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic