Talk:LAGEOS

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 136.159.160.122 in topic Information missing for LAGEOS-2

Brass vs depleted uranium

edit

01aug2009, Makeyev (talk · contribs) replaced 'brass' to 'depleted uranium' [1]. I am not sure this is correct. You don't need uranium to get 400 kg from a 60 cm sphere. It is true that this ref speaks of 'depleted uranium', but this one or this one tells it is brass. Which is compatible with the weight and probably much easier to manufacture. (Deep impact's impactor was made of copper) -- Xofc (talk) 07:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I did undo it. -- Xofc (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Xofc. I'll try to check up the fact (before your post I was shure that it's made of U).Makeyev (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

What results reported

edit

eg Can anyone confirm that LAGEOS results confirmed the Lense–Thirring precession to +/- 10% in 2004 as claimed by Gregs post in Gravity probe B results ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
LAGEOUS results are mentioned (with sources) in Gravity Probe B. - Rod57 (talk) 10:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Message Image

edit

Oddly, the Russian Wikipedia has a picture of the message plaque, which the English Wikipedia doesn't.

IE: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LAGEOS-FILE.png

Should it be included?

Youngwilliam (talk) 05:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Who built them?

edit

Reading over this article, I was surprised at the paucity of information about who built these satellites, how they were launched and who operates them. Wikipedia articles on just about all other spacecraft have information about who manufactured them, and exact launch dates and information about launch equipment (i.e. what booster was used). Here we are told only that LAGEOS 1 and 2 were launched in 1976 and 1992, respectively, and that LAGEOS 2 was launched aboard STS-52. That appears to be it. I think at the least this article could be flagged for needing improvement (I do not know how to do that, as I am a bit of a newbie Wikipedia editor, but I have seen such flags appearing at the top of other articles). Arpd1234 (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article doesn't even mention that they are NASA satellites, and I would expect that information to be included in the introduction.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LAGEOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Information missing for LAGEOS-2

edit

For balance, and also for the sake of completeness, there are two pieces of information missing with regards to LAGEOS-2: