Talk:Kyla Tyson

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleKyla Tyson has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed

GA on hold

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  5. It is stable.
     
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

The only problems I have with this article are the following:

  • Citations are not needed for every plot point. They are only necessary for potentially contentious statements. Repeatedly citing the BBC website with a small episode summary is unnecessary every time the plot is discussed. In addition, many of these plot citations are used for sentences which state something beyond the plot, such as, "More recently, the character has been portrayed as increasingly emotionally unstable, breaking down". See WP:CITE.
  •   Done - Removed approximately two dozen extraneous citations to BBC episode summaries, replacing those necessary with more suitable references.
  • There appears to be original research in this article under a number of sections: Personality ("Each of these traits quickly became obvious within the character"), Relationships ("The character's poor taste in men - central to most all of her storylines on the show - was also quickly made apparent"), and especially Popularity ("Of the major storylines attributed to the character, Kyla's romance with doctor Abra Durant (Adrian Edmondson) has proved the most popular. This is perhaps unsurprising considering that Edmondson is one of only two cast members, alongside Patsy Kensit, to have achieved notable fame outside the show. The popularity of this plot strand is most clearly demonstrated by the viewing figures for the episodes culminating the character's three most major storylines to date"). There may be other hints of original research throughout the article other than what I just mentioned.
  •   Done - Reworded the first two examples, removed the last entirely - also nixed a few other sentences which seemed to qualify under WP:OR throughout.
  • This may be my personal bias, but it seems that there is far too much plot information and not enough information about background and casting. I would rather see information speaking about Kyla as a cultural agent rather than exactly what has happened to her throughout her character's career on the show. In addition, it would be helpful to look at cultural and/or character analysis of Kyla.
  •   Done - Reduced the plot summary by around forty percent, added extra information to 'Background', 'Casting' and 'Reception'.

Other than that the article is well-written and seems to be laid out well. Hopefully these few concerns can be addressed within the next 7 days. -- Noetic Sage 19:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I appreciate your concerns, and I'll get working on rectifying them - hopefully bringing the article up to standard within the week. Frickative 22:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA pass

edit

I have re-reviewed the article (as 7 days have passed) and see you have done superb work in addressing the previous concerns. The article looks excellent! I have listed the article as a Good Article, congrats! For further improvement, consider adding some citations to the Storylines section (only for important points - don't reference the old BBC plot summaries). In addition, if you find any academic articles about Kyla as a cultural agent (see Google Scholar, etc), that would make the article even better. Other than that, keep up the fantastic work! -- Noetic Sage 20:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kyla&Abra.png

edit
 

Image:Kyla&Abra.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:KylaHarvey.PNG

edit
 

Image:KylaHarvey.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:KylaMax.PNG

edit
 

Image:KylaMax.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:KylaTysonChildrenInNeed.png

edit
 

Image:KylaTysonChildrenInNeed.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kyla Tyson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kyla Tyson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kyla Tyson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply