Talk:Kyŏn Hwŏn
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI moved this from Gyeonhwon to Gyeon Hwon shortly after creating the article, although "Gyeonhwon" is more common in English. As far as I know there is no WP precedent for compounding Korean family names and personal names into a single word like this, and contemporary two-syllable names like Taebong's founder "Gung Ye" are uniformly (within WP) given in two-word format.
Anyone think "Gyeonhwon" should be a single word? --Visviva 15:50, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I think Gyeonhwon and Gungye are Wrong. Many Koreans treat Gyeon (or Jin) and Gung as family names. (PS: I'm a South Korean.) So far as I know, many old documents written in classical Chinese did it too.
- Example: 弓궁王왕 大대闕궐 터희 烏오雀작이 지죄기니 -Jung Cheol(정철; 鄭澈, Jeong Cheol), Gwandong Byeolgok(관동별곡; 關東別曲; "the Special Tune of Gwandong") written in Korean language of Joseon Dynasty --yes0song 13:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gyeon Hwon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610014613/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=B&i=111995&v=43 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=B&i=111995&v=43
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610014625/http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=255036&v=43 to http://100.nate.com/dicsearch/pentry.html?s=K&i=255036&v=43
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)