Talk:Kreisky–Peter–Wiesenthal affair
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Court case
editWhere can we see the results of the court case in which, by the sound of it, Wiesenthal proved that at least some of Kreisky's allegations were unfounded? Were some of the allegations accepted as true? Is there a link between this and the fact that Simon Wiesenthal no longer has anything to do with the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, other than to accept an alleged $90,000 a year for the use of his name? PRtalk 19:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please stop soapboxing and using the project as if it were a usenet forum or your blog. If you have suggestions for improving the article, make them. NoCal100 (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Nazi minister numbers, four or five
editNoticed there is a discrepancy in the mentioned number of ministers accused of being Nazis in this article (Wiesenthal soon pointed out that five of his appointed ministers had a Nazi past..") while in the Simon Wiesenthal article there is mention of four ("Wiesenthal pointed out to the press that four of his new cabinet appointees had been members of the Nazi Party") Four ministers are also mentioned on the Bruno Kreisky page.
Whoever knows the real number might want to update this. I think its four, but not sure: Spiegel article mentions four; JTA.org mentions five; ajc.org has four; German wiki mentions four as well.
On a side note, reference 14 has this weird thing: Minicy Catom Software Engineering Ltd. www.catom.com. "Austria's Attitude Toward Israel: Following the European Mainstream". Jcpa.org. Retrieved 2010-04-17. Besides the fact that the link does not work, I think it might be spam.
Oh and try to be lenient, I'm just getting started here;)... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jozda (talk • contribs) 00:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)