Talk:Konrad von Hochstaden
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Can someone explain this?
edithttp://failblog.org/2010/02/04/stone-sculpture-fail/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.177.239 (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
this is a re-touched photograph. This awful carving is the support for the statue of the bishop. They have jiggered with the photo to remove the bishop & just show the support. This creates the false impression the carving is of the bishop, which it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.48.71.75 (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The photo is authentic, the statue was being mended elsewhere at that time. It is from the town hall, though, as stated below the other image. Benito (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Why is that the base of the statue?--Keesto (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Seriously, how has this not been addressed? How is that not in the article proper? Someone with actual information on this subject, please elucidate us on the matter. -- Random Internet Person Checking Up On Facebook Image Only To Find Next To No Information On Wikipedia 20:30, 11 January 2015
Base of the Statue ??
editWhat reason/history is the vulgar demented base of the statue??? continued silence is admitting that he was being publicly shamed . For all time ?? 38.178.83.52 (talk) 13:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)