Talk:Kongfrontation

Latest comment: 6 years ago by GoneIn60 in topic Infobox parameter for status
Former good article nomineeKongfrontation was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kongfrontation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Quick-failing

Sorry, but two references isn't good enough for a good article. Peanut4 (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kongfrontation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kongfrontation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Infobox parameter for status

edit

@186.88.45.63: The status field can have one of four statuses: Under construction, Operating, Closed, and Removed. Clearly in this case, since the attraction no longer exists, the status is Removed. Closed is an indefinite status, per our discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Archive 3#Status fields in attraction articles, and should only be used when the attraction still exists. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply