Talk:Knowledge process outsourcing

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments

edit

knowledge proces outsourcing in ites —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.71.153.66 (talkcontribs)

provide domain-based processes ... enables KPO by treating all functions as services ... large knowledge pool and a significant cost arbitrage. You know what would be good? It would be good if someone translated this article into English. --Rbreen (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC) .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.112.83.142 (talk) 10:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge to BPO

edit

There is a proposed merge to business process outsourcing. I would support that merge. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knowledge process outsourcing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply