Talk:Kirkley

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Barberella99 in topic Regeneration? You joke.

Kirkley Hall

edit

Kirkley is in Suffolk, yet Kirkley Hall is in Northumberland, explain? Theses no Hall in Kirley I'm aware of ICryOverSpiltMilk (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regeneration? You joke.

edit

"Kirkley is part of a major regeneration of the Lowestoft area.[2]"

Quite the reverse, there has been a thundering great main road built through the middle of it in what used to be quiet green open spaces. Plus horrible ugly commercial buildings, one of them voted the worst eyesore in Suffolk, never used and now boarded up. So its true to say its degeneration even though its shiny new degeneration. 80.0.117.222 (talk) 13:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

lol, I agree its change for the sake of change, and what a waste of the tax payers money, couldn't it be better spent on restoring the old structures? That whopping road just gets you to the traffic jams quicker, the only way to stop the gridlock is to built a 3rd crossing in addition to Oulton Broad and Bascule Bridge 79.75.143.1 (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The new bridge is being built. The large road is a bypass. Kirkley remains largely as was designed in Victorian times and retains its Victorian seaside charm. Barberella99 (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article Status

edit

I have significant concerns about this article.

I have attempted to rewrite it in keeping with the style guidance at WP:UKTOWNS and remove material which is either irrelevant or clear pov. I do think there needs to be more stuff here - South Beach and Claremont etc... almost certainly belong, and there clearly needs to be more on the regeneration - but it needs to be citeable. Oh, and the A12 needs a mention. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Football club name

edit

Can we accept that the club is called Kirkley and Pakefield FC please. This is the name given on the club's website for goodness sake - and the name used in all local media. Your edits are boring and about to go over WP:3RR. This will be reported if it happens again I'm afraid. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kirkley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply