Talk:Kir Ianulea

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kir Ianulea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321152817/http://www.plural-magazine.com/ to http://www.plural-magazine.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427072852/http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/scriitorii-de-la-adev-rul.html to http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/scriitorii-de-la-adev-rul.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

How can this one be rated as Mid whereas the article on Luca Arbore was rated as Low? Luca left a far greater legacy than this story, including the monastery (UNESCO), defending the capital Suceava (1497) and so much more. --Cei Trei (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

i want to point out that the article on arbore was assessed after the info above was added. --Cei Trei (talk) 17:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Arbore's defense of Suceava is equivalent to Tyrion Lannister's defense of King's Landing. --Cei Trei (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps there was a mix up? This article is, indeed, of (very) low importance. Could it be changed to low? --Cei Trei (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Btw, the article on Tyrion Lannister is assessed as being of High-Importance (which it is). Just a little comparison. Both defend their capitals, but only one is assessed as high. At least give the other guy a Mid-importance for pete's sake! --Cei Trei (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

The "Low" rating of Luca Arbore is limited to WikiProject Christianity; a higher importance rating may be appropriate for other projects.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Just want to add that the monastery he built is listed on the UNESCO World Heritage List and is the subject of international study. Oh, and he also killed 'infidels'. Ok, strike that last one. --Cei Trei (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

The above idiotic query is by a sockpuppet of Anittas (just check out his record of contributions and comments: the same obsessions, the same trolling), who has made it his habit to stalk me; he is only here because I was the one who edited the Arbore article and this one in the past days. How his new account is not banned yet and how decent editors spend time answering his nonsense is beyond me. Dahn (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)