Talk:Kimchi fried rice

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge

edit

Given that recipes are specifically excluded from Wikipedia (see WP:ISNOT#HOWTO - they should be transwikied to Wikibooks:Cookbook) - is this ever going to be more than a stub? Would it be better merged with either kimchi, or ISTR seeing a bokkeumbap article somewhere? FlagSteward 23:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

As this is not food, I don't know what it is, but it's not food. All jokes aside, it should be merged into kimichi; because there is no one type of kimichi, all kimichi's are different, from house hold to house hold, state to state, etc etc. 16:15 leveni 11 April 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.77.17 (talk) 06:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 February 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


KimchibokkeumbapKimchi fried rice – The food is rarely called "kimchi bokkeumbap" by an English speaker. "Kimchi fried rice" is a commonly used English name, and also the standardized translation of the food. (See Standardized Romanizations and Translations (English, Chinese, and Japanese) of (200) Major Korean Dishes by the National Institute of Korean Language) MaeveCosgrave (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimchi fried rice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimchi fried rice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply