This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I am intrigued by the reference to King attributing the public's interest in the case to "unadulterated racism". That is the first time I have heard such a comment. Is there any commentary from anyone else to back up that seemingly odd view? Since King himself was under severe stress and died soon after, should we be talking his comments seriously, and even referring to it?203.184.41.226 (talk) 00:04, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
King's calling it "unadulterated racism" is a defence lawyer spinning words though it's also accurate. King was talking about a form of public and media bias where crimes involving whites, and the wealthy, get far more coverage than similar crimes among the browns. Scott Guy was both white and wealthy which lead to sensationalised media coverage. The missing white woman syndrome is also an example of this. --Marc Kupper|talk21:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is sorely lacking in detail and background information. Up till today, it began with the sentence "The police alleged that Macdonald had held a grudge against Scott after the latter returned from outback Australia in 2008, suggested a leisure park venture, and spoke of his wish to inherit the farm." There is no explanation of who Macdonald was, who Scott Guy was, what the relationship between them was, why Macdonald may have held a grudge, or what a leisure park has to do with the story. It needs a lot more added before it will make any sense to the reader. Doubledowndemo (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
