Talk:Killing of Daniel Prude
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Killing of Daniel Prude article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2020
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add: On September 3, 2020, Mayor Lovely Warren announced the seven officers present on the night Daniel Prude died in police custody will be immediately suspended, against the advice of her legal counsel. Because of civil service laws, they will be suspended with pay. The names of the officers are Sgt. Michael Magri, Officer Josiah Harris, Officer Paul Ricotta, Officer Francisco Santiago, Officer Andrew Specksgoor, Officer Troy Taladay and Officer Mark Vaughn.[1] --217.234.78.101 (talk) 03:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. JTP (talk • contribs) 18:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Excited delirium
editExcited delirium should not be in the lead. Excited delirium does not exists. It was a euphemism for 'death by excessive police force'.
The Robert Dziekański Taser incident in Canada → "Excited delirium entered into the public and media lexicon around the time that increased use of electrical weapons ignited controversy in the United States, Canada, and the UK. As a result, both medical task forces and public inquiries into the connection between police use of force, excited delirium, and in-custody deaths have recurred throughout the past decade." --217.234.78.101 (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's in the report by the medical examiner, so it stays. WWGB (talk) 04:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but it's not recognized by the APA, or the WHO. We should therefore be clear that it was what was found by the report, and we should not take a position on its validity. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- We can't have a 'Schrodinger's autopsy' treatment to the report. Either it is reliable source or it is not. I would caution against this as it opens the door of renaming the article from 'Killing' to 'Death', again as what defines it as a killing is the autopsy. Ledootdoot (talk) 14:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but it's not recognized by the APA, or the WHO. We should therefore be clear that it was what was found by the report, and we should not take a position on its validity. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Examination of sources regarding 'spitting at them'
editThere's a lack of weight in RS, and perhaps even a matter of contention for the NYT and BG, regarding the direction of the spitting. I've analysed a spread of secondary sources below. I've also made a small edit to the lede to keep it neutral and reflect weight in RS.
The Guardian avoids describing in any way Prude's spitting, instead describing the intended use of the [spit hood] device.
WaPo does the same with "police had covered his head with a white “spit hood,” designed to protect police from bodily fluids".
The Star Tribune makes a similar description about intended use, but further clarifies that "One officer wrote that they put the hood on Prude because he was spitting continuously in the direction of officers".
BBC states "He spits repeatedly on the ground". They omit to mention the direction.
CBS News states "then tried to stop him from spitting". They also omit to mention any direction.
The New York Times says it was "apparently in an effort to prevent him from spitting on them" [sic]. The use of "apparently" is IMO indicative that they don't believe the source is reliable enough to state it as fact.
The New York Times in another article state: "He spits on the ground multiple times, but does not seem to be aiming at the officers."
In contrast, the Boston Globe state "he could be seen on body camera footage spitting in the direction of officers".
Regards, Zindor (talk) 01:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Joe Prude, conference, September 2, 2020
editPlease add: Joe Prude: "When I say 'got lynched,' that was a full-fledged on-going murder, cold-blooded" --93.211.218.141 (talk) 06:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- See the first paragraph of Killing of Daniel Prude#Reactions. WWGB (talk) 06:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
edit@ThrowPrude21: please discuss your additions here. Zindor (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2020
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request to include the autopsy report in the summary section:
Link to Autopsy Report: https://imgur.com/a/Ia585zt
You can find official sources elsewhere, easily.
KEY POINTS:
The autopsy reports Daniel had a clinical history of severe respiratory acidosis, a clinical history of profound global hypoxic ischemic injuries, a clinical history of suicidal ideation with possible auditory hallucinations and paranoia, and a clinical history of agitation with combative behavior.[1] ThrowPrude21 (talk) 19:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Imgur https://imgur.com/a/Ia585zt.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
Not done – Please provide a reliable secondary source such as an online newspaper or magazine article. We cannot use primary sources such as autopsy reports directly for such claims. We need a reliable news agency to authenticate the document and offer their analysis. It is only such analysis by a reliable publication that we can use as a basis for adding this material to the Wikipedia page.
- Our policies on Biographies of living people, which also covers the recently dead, requires that we use extreme caution. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 19:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- See further discussion on the requestor's user talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2020
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm requesting this be added to the summary:
"The autopsy reports Daniel had a clinical history of severe respiratory acidosis, a clinical history of profound global hypoxic ischemic injuries, a clinical history of suicidal ideation with possible auditory hallucinations and paranoia, and a clinical history of agitation with combative behavior."[1] ThrowPrude21 (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ . Rochester First https://www.rochesterfirst.com/news/local-news/autopsy-report-daniel-prude-death-ruled-a-homicide-asphyxia-due-to-physical-restraint/.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
- Not done –
As previously stated, parts of the report are quoted and discussed already in this article. To ensure privacy for the family and to provide information in a conservative manner, as per Wikipedia policies on Biographies of living people, it would be unnecessary to add the whole report to this page. Is there a reason you want this added in its entirety? AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2020
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To be added to the second week of subsequent protests:
The Sep 7 protest in front of the Public Safety Building was repeated, with even more people, on Sep 10 in front of City Hall.[2] Larrymoss~commonswiki (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Done. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 03:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2021
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Death of Daniel Prude Yogini989 (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not done. Prude's death was ruled a homicide so "killing" is not inappropriate. WWGB (talk) 00:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Needs updating
editThere have been several developments in this case in the last 3 or 4 years, so the article needs to be updated. I will put it on my watchlist and get to it soon. Dgndenver (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)