Talk:Kia K5

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'll try this again. There is a photo posted as the first on the page that shows the current Kia Optima/Magentis. As a comparison, keeping the 2005 Optima as the beginning photo would be like leaving the old Pepsi logo at the beginning of Pepsi's Wikipedia page. Thank you in advance for your respect and cooperation. 24.247.138.105 (talk) 09:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Obvious difference: to my knowledge, whatever WikiProject covers the Pepsi article doesn't have this stated in its guidelines: "The image selected for an article's top (lead) infobox does not need to show any particular version or generation of the vehicle, such as the latest, the last, the first, the best-selling, or any other. Vehicle production date is not a factor when determining the quality of an image and its suitability to illustrate the lead infobox."

Very simple issue. Cut it out.IFCAR (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blank "fourth-generation" section

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The section for the fourth-generation Optima is completely blank. Can someone sort this out and write text for it? Thanks. Blurp92 (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

It has been solved. Quite some time ago, actually. Thanks to whoever did that. However, I will say that I do have a gripe with it: It sounds way too much like an advertisement, with an unsettling abundance of grammar that would be more commonplace on marketing material. Not exactly befitting of an online encyclopaedia with a strict policy on writing from a neutral point of view. Blurp92 (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kia Optima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090404134823/http://www.avtotor.ru/kia/ to http://www.avtotor.ru/kia/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090404134823/http://www.avtotor.ru/kia/ to http://www.avtotor.ru/kia/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic