Talk:Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn Tulun

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Gog the Mild in topic GA Review

The name "Khumarawayh"

edit

Khumarawayh is an Arabized form of the word Khumār (خمار) + the Persian suffix -ūyah (ویه). --Z 11:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Khumarawayh ibn Ahmad ibn Tulun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 13:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


I'll start on this over the next couple of days. (A standard GAN; or the full, headed-for-FAC, treatment?) Gog the Mild (talk) 13:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gog the Mild, I don't think that in its present state it qualifies for A-class/FA. It is definitely a fairly complete treatment (definitely the most comprehensive one I know of) but not at the level of detail I would aspire to for the higher ratings. Nevertheless, as usual, feel free to be as nitpicky as you want. Kick the tires to your heart's content :) Constantine 16:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have been bold in my copy editing, so you will want to check it.

  • "His father, Ahmad ibn Tulun, was the son of a Turkish slave who had been appointed governor of Egypt since 868" Was his father or the slave appointed governor?
  • Sources: Bonner: the title should be in title case.

Hmm. Assessing for GAN, that's all I can find. You haven't lost your touch. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done and thanks, Gog the Mild :). Beyond GA criteria, comprehensibility etc.? Constantine 09:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Another great little article and I am happy to promote.
Beyond GA it is pretty good. Some minor issues I would want to discuss with you if it were at FAC, but nothing black and white, so I left them. It is, IMO, FACable as it stands. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed