Talk:Key disclosure law

I beleive the importance of the subject matter on this needs to be flagged as high rather than low. In a world where data secuity, civil liberties and police powers are constantly at loggerheads this topic needs to be fully understood.

I would like someone from the relevant international judiciaries to comment on the application of the laws more fully including any successful challenges.

For example what is the position if a person is required to provide a key but they have in fact lost the key. Would this constitue "witholding" or "refusal to provide"? 62.189.19.125 (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I'd appreciate a review of the page I created for United States v. Kirschner, if anyone is willing. Copiesofcopies (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

likely copyvio

The diff from 2012 March 13 adds a bunch of text identical to this ars technica article. --Nanite (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Please add Russia

https://www.mondaq.com/russianfederation/Privacy/750216/Privacy-And-Cybersecurity-In-Russia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.255.10.178 (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Shouldn't the section on the US mention CBP's "100-mile zone"?

The Border search exception gives federal Customs and Border Patrol agents in the United States broad powers to demand that a person hand over their passwords and decryption keys for their devices without any warrant. B9 (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)