Talk:Kenya at the 2002 Winter Olympics

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kenya at the 2002 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522105330/http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm to http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kenya at the 2002 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Will look at this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Background

• "They have competed at most Summer Olympic Games since then" - get rid of then
• "consisted of one cross-country skier, Philip Boit. Boit had also" - try not to have the sentences start and end like this
• "As the only participant for Kenya, he was selected as" - try As his country's only participant, Boit was selected as

Cross-country skiing

• "scouted by American sportswear company Nike, Inc.," - think having just Nike will suffice here
• "This ranked him 77th for the event, and only the top 60 were allowed to proceed to the second 10 kilometre freestyle portion of the event" - reptition of event
• "Only the top 16 finishers were advanced to the quarterfinals" - remove were

Referneces

• Reference 7 is misssing Associated Press as the agency that provided the story to The Seattle Times

That all I have. Will put this review on hold for the time being. MWright96 (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Everything addressed, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 07:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @Courcelles: Nice quick response. Can now gladly promote this to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)