Talk:Keith Crook

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Martin Kealey in topic Use of honorific
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith Crook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Use of honorific

edit

While the use of "Dr" may be appropriate in when describing his academic career, it seems odd in the other sections of his life. I have intentionally omitted his title in the section on his involvement with Quakers, who generally eschew all titles, but this leads to an odd vacillation in the article overall. I think the best solution would be to change "Dr Crook" to "Keith Crook" everywhere except the academic section, but I await feedback from other editors. Martin Kealey (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply