Talk:Katharine Lane Weems
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Carptrash in topic references
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
references
editAt the end of the third paragraph of the works at Harvard section it mentions [ambler 31-33]. Is this proper format? Should the biliography get turned into references and this become a [#] reference instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swartzcr (talk • contribs) 13:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- I am not happy (and the point of wikipedia (opinion) is to make me happy) with any of the references here. One link just goes to the Archives of American Art, not very useful. Perhaps on a day when my septic tank has not just overflowed I'll see if I can improve these. Or, why don't you ( Swartzcr ) take a shot at it? Carptrash (talk) 02:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)