Talk:Karen Bardsley

2015 World Cup performance

Goalkeeper Karen Bardsley played the entire game and gave up no goals to Germany.[1] England won 3rd place this year, and it was mentioned several times it was the first time for England to beat Germany, moving to (1-2-18 wins ties loses.) -- AstroU (talk) 23:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC) PS: Nice article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Karen Bardsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090805234444/http://www.womensprosoccer.com/ny/players/bios/bardsley-karen to http://www.womensprosoccer.com/ny/players/bios/bardsley-karen
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090805234444/http://www.womensprosoccer.com/ny/players/bios/bardsley-karen to http://www.womensprosoccer.com/ny/players/bios/bardsley-karen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit war

Speaker of Truth and Wisdom and 23.251.87.229 you are both engaged in an edit war over this article. I would like to remind you that you are not permitted to do more than three reverts within 24 hours, due to WP:3RR. You have both reached that limit and any more reversions will most likely result in a block. If you have a dispute, please settle it here. IP, you seem to believe that a primary source has stated that she is LGBT+, but Speaker disagrees. Please resolve the situation here. I will be monitoring this page. Thank you. Giraffer (munch) 12:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm very sorry for not taking to this page earlier to discuss the dispute, it was immature of me. I got distracted as I was waiting for a reply to the message Where's my Lasange left on the talk page of 23.251.87.229, I realise that both of us should have tried to resolve the dispute here instead. The issue I have is that IP's argument does not only rely on a primitive and questionable 'primary source', but that she is also attempting to add a source which is made up of user-generated content to try and back-up her point. This article: https://www.outsports.com/2019/6/11/18660301/out-gay-lesbian-bi-2019-women-world-cup-soccer is by admission based on 'reader tips', and its a lot less reliable than the Gay Star News article on this subject as a result (https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/meet-the-41-out-gay-and-bi-soccer-stars-in-the-womens-world-cup-2019/). The issue I have with the 'primary source', which, by the way, is not cited in the article itself, is that there's no way to verify its authenticity. People regularly create edited and/or photoshopped 'screenshots' of online conversations. If this is a reliable source, then I could just say well I had my own conversation with Karen and she said differently, and then provide a screenshot which I have made on Microsoft Paint and say that I've spoken to her. This is a biography of a living person: since when do we use screenshots from someone's social media messages as source's on BLP's? We don't, because they are in no way reputable. As I say, 'Tina's Instagram DMs' are not a reputable source.

People can easily fabricate the existence of conversations with someone online. As I say, you can message a random person with a block of text pretending to be Karen Bardsley and then easily photoshop this text as to place it on a 'screenshot' of a conversation with Bardsley and make it look like she has said that to you. I'm not saying that 23.251.87.229 has necessarily done that, but how do we know for sure? Tina's Instagram DM's are not verifiable. They are not reputable. They are not fact-checked. They do not have an established reputation as a reputable source.

Speaker of Truth and Wisdom Thank you for replying promptly. Having heard your point I agree with you, Instagram DM's are not verifiable. If the IP breaks 3RR I will report them to WP:AN3. They have been blocked for one day. Regards, Giraffer (munch) 13:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Steven Cook which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

LGBT

This article lists her in such categories- and a quick look in Google results corroborates- but no mention/ citation is apparent in the article, which seems odd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.237.90 (talk) 20:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)