Talk:K-4 (Kansas highway)
![]() | K-4 (Kansas highway) was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 24, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the K-4 (Kansas highway) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on K-4 (Kansas highway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927002028/http://www.route56.com/highways/highways.cgi?hwy1=4&fulldesc=1&hist=1&I=1&photos=1 to http://www.route56.com/highways/highways.cgi?hwy1=4&fulldesc=1&hist=1&I=1&photos=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:K-4 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 01:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Will review in a bit. The article, however, looks to be in poor condition. The highway is quite long but the history section is short and the route description is quite underwhelming (and does not have adequate citations). You will need to add more non-map sources as well. SounderBruce 01:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Comments
edit@SounderBruce: I fixed a lot of the problems you mentioned. Let me know what else, Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
From my first read through:
- Infobox and lead
- Length needs to be cited in the infobox
- Junction list in infobox has too many entries (per WP:USRD/STDS)
- Comma missing after "state highway in Kansas"
- The second sentence should mention the overall span of the highway, in terms of what regions it connects, rather than jumping straight to a terminus.
- "traverses eastward" is not grammatically correct
- Missing comma before "including"
- "Then by", drop the "then"
- "the former K-52" is missing a descriptor (route, alignment of)
- The lead is way too short compared to the rest of the article
- Route description
- Caption on first image has a typo (K-14)
- Don't use "parallels" as a verb
- "Interstate" should not be capitalized by itself; I suggest using "freeway" instead
- Exit numbers aren't important and could be omitted for better flow
- "K-4" is overused and should be replaced with a variety of aliases
- The route description neglects to mention terrain, features, nearby places, or any number of useful things. It reads like a readout from a turn-by-turn navigation system.
And that's where I stopped closely reading. This article has huge issues with WP:PROSELINE text in the History section, is missing mileposts in the junction list, and has a whole host of WP:MOS violations (such as WP:DATECOMMA). It clearly does not meet GA standards and would not without a major amount of work. SounderBruce 07:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)