Talk:Kâzım Karabekir
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kâzım Karabekir article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
editArticle reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Constantinople-Istanbul
editSome users think that it is nesessary sources to prove modern researchers prefer to Istanbul. Anyway this edit is very harmful. Because the city where Karabekir was born in is not explained in the article Constantinople. I also use Constantinople, for example in the article I Corps (Ottoman Empire), but we cannot deny the usage of Istanbul since many academicians use it. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 08:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- So why did you change "Constantinople" to "Istanbul" throughout this article? You can't have it both ways - in other articles you have been changing "Turks" to "Ottomans" (like here: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Russo-Turkish_War_%281877%E2%80%931878%29&action=historysubmit&diff=399680482&oldid=399634006). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.143.19 (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- They are different issue. Both Istanbul and Constantinople are not wrong. We can use Constantinople for Istanbul till 1930. In this case, we must not give link of Constantinople when we white Constantinople in place with Istanbul. It's important. About your second question, Ottoman Army, Ottoman Navy are not Turkish Army, Turkish Navy. Takabeg (talk) 07:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Kazim Karabekir HouseSpeaker.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Kazim Karabekir HouseSpeaker.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)