 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 May 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jurassic World article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Jurassic World. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Jurassic World at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2015, when it received 14,283,010 views. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 9 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Redundant comparisons
editUndoubtedly, this is a great film with outstanding performance in many aspects but I think we should delete all the other films and their revenue cited in the reception section since such info. is completely irrelevant to Jurassic World itself and not that meaningful. It's well enough to know that it has broken numerous records. Full lists are available on their main pages or references. In dialogue with Biomedicinal 13:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Why not include product placements?
editInclude. kleinster 03:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- What product placements? Have reliable sources provided any significant coverage of them? DonIago (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- One car brand got way to much screen time. Nobody wants to mention it one more time. --87.141.16.6 (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Horror film?
editReviewing the edit history for this article, I see that multiple IPs have removed the categorization of this film as a horror film, and have consistently been reverted. My question is: why? The lead doesn't describe JW as being a horror film, nor does the body of the article in its current form appear to describe it as such, and I didn't see that the edit summaries provided by the reverting editors ever included a rationale for reinstating the category.
As such, I've taken it upon myself to remove the 'horror film' category. Editors who believe JW should be classified as such are welcome to provide their reasoning here. DonIago (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Turner Classic Movie database classifies it as "horror," which was why editors were categorizing it as horror here. Mr Fink (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; I don't have any objection to that, but it should be added to the article before the category is re-added, as categories are required to be supported by the article's verifiable content. DonIago (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)