This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editWhy is this article referred to as "Jupiter LI" and not "S/20120 J1"? All other satellites with provisional designations are referred to with this standard. 134340Goat (talk) 19:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @134340Goat: Probably because this satellite and Jupiter LII have gotten their Roman numerals, but not names. Double sharp (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)