Wikipedia

Talk:Juliet Gellatley

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

NPOV

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

There are no citations from independent sources, i.e. ones not directly linked to subject. In fact, the whole thing reads like PR fluff. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see the tag has been removed without adequate explanation, nor any addressing of the issues highlighted above. The only cited sources are inextricably linked to the subject herself, which is hardly acceptable. Nick Cooper (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps you could find some more sources, then, Nick, because there are plenty around. If you see anything that you feel might be inaccurate, please point it out, and I'll look around for a secondary source. SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 00:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well not by me but I am working ont he article and a fluff piece is to be avoided at all costs esp as she is marginally notable. Thanks, SqueakBox 00:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
SlimVirgin, the page is as self-evidently poorly sourced and inherently biased. I find your accusation of "drive-by tagging" bizarre, given that I have already pointed why the article should be tagged. Obviously I touched a raw nerve somewhere.... Nick Cooper (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
What raw nerve would that be? My point is that you tagged the article weeks ago, then didn't contribute any further. If you're going to tag, you need to stick around to help sort out what you think the problem is. SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 01:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Certainly some examples of POV would be useful, I have no agenda here but I do want an uncontested NPOV article so if you can let us know what the specific problems are we can address them, and if you are unhappy with the refs or EL stuff you should remove what you are unhappy with, eg unreliable sources. Thanks, SqueakBox 01:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
SlimVirgin, that seems a strange attitude about "how things should be done". I stumbled across this page accidentally (as one is apt to do on Wikipedia) last month, and while having no particular interest in the subject or her work, noted the poor quality of the sourcing and tagged it appopriately. As it stood, it seemed about as neutral as having the one on Tony Blair based solely on sourcing to the Labour Party or other closely-linked organisations. One would presume that editors who are more familiar with and interested in the subject and her work will be in a better position to find more reliable sources - both online and in other media - than someone like myself, who isn't. That nobody has either done so, or even responded to my first comment above does not seem to justify removing the tag.
As to the page as it stands now, I would make the following observations:
  • The generic link to the Vegetarian and Vegan Society does not substantiate the claim that the subject was a co-founder of that organisation. Googling on their site specifically only seems to produce numerous links to her being described as a founder of Viva.
  • The new material relating to "Britches" links to what seems to be a blog site, while a cursory Google does not substantiate the claim that the subject wrote the "text" for the PETA film.
  • While the previous overambitious claim that the subject "successfully campaigned for the banning of kangaroo meat in the UK" has now been modified, the current text still seems to be misleading in light of the fact that kangaroo meat is still available in the UK (quite legally, it seems), e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc. One would also note the statement from the Australian High Commission claiming inaccuracies in Viva's claims. That said, one would presume that this particular subject would have attracted some mainstream media attention that would be far more suitable for sourcing than the interested parties (on both sides) themselves.
  • The first link to savethekangaroo.com does not substantiate the claim that the subject "successfully persuaded David Beckham and Michael Owen to stop using (kangaroo skin) shoes", merely that Adidas make shoes with this type of leather; I have neither the time nor the inclination to sit through the video. Given the media attention the Beckham in particular gets, surely there is a reliable third party source for this?
Overall this does not strike me as much of an "improvement", and the sources used remain distrubingly one-sided. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nick, if you want to improve those areas of the article, by all means do. A two-minute search on Google returns these pages [4] [5] [6] on Beckham and kangaroo boots, for example. All I was asking is that the page be worked on, rather than tagged and left. SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 17:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Time flies

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Two years later, and I note that most of my above criticisms have remained unaddressed, specifically:

  • The blog citation for the "Britches" piece is now a dead link, which I am therefore deleting. There is no mention of Gellatley on Britches (monkey).
  • The claim that the export trade in kangaroo meat, "has now stopped entirely" remains demonstrably false in light of the following links: [7], [8], [9]. It is notable that the first two are companies that I cited previously, which are clearly still in business. I am replacing the false claim of cessation with text and citations accurately reflecting the actual situation (this is to say nothing of David Haye's reported consumption). It should be noted that this section was very poorly constructed, with the time-line of events very muddled, which I have also addressed.
  • There is still no reliable third-party reference for the claim that Gellatley, "successfully persuaded David Beckham and Michael Owen to stop using (kangaroo skin) shoes." The cited Viva page no longer mentions either Beckham or Owen (if it ever did), so I am deleting it. Of the three links claimed by SlimVirgin above, the last two are now dead. The first is Gellatley's own site, which seems to only detail correlation, rather than causality, i.e. that at one point Beckham stopped using the boots, but not that it was actually due to her campaign.

I could also add that the current text about the Greenscene magazine seems to be lacking the detail that it now seems to be defunct, or that it was only a quarterly [10] that Gellatley herself acknowledged was merely "a low circulation magazine produced principally for educational purposes" [11]. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Juliet Gellatley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Additional info

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

My understanding is that Juliet Gellatley (a) was actively involved with Vegans International (no data on that appears in her article) and that she married[1][2] sometime after 1995 (and moved to Australia). MaynardClark (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Menopause Madness! Are you a hostage to hormones? What are the solutions? By Juliet Gellatley
  2. ^ VIVA! - Vegetarians International Voice For Animals, IVU ONLINE NEWS | International Vegetarian Union | 03/21/11
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Juliet Gellatley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Juliet Gellatley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Juliet Gellatley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Juliet_Gellatley&oldid=1255949947"