Talk:Julie Anne Genter

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Andykatib in topic Edit request


Does she have residency or citizenship?

edit

I presume she has at least the former? I couldn't find anything after a quick look on her website. Can she even be an MP without citizenship? Presume someone else could clarify that, which might resolve this question quickly by default... Ingolfson (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

You must have citizenship before you are eligible to stand for Parliament. Schwede66 08:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
She's a dual citizen of NZ and the USA. I've added a reference (Hansard) to the article about this.--Muzilon (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lives in Auckland

edit

Her website (http://julieanne.co.nz/) states she's based in Auckland, and I understand that she does in fact live here. The article makes it look like she (still) lives in Wellington. A quick google news didn't turn up any newspaper / media references that could be used to clarify that. Is using her own website suitable as a reference that she doesn't live in Wellington (anymore)? 125.237.18.123 (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Now back in Wellington; article needs updating (and I won't do it as I've got a WP:COI). Schwede66 23:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Julie Anne Genter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recognised within the industry as an expert

edit

It is claimed that "She is recognised within the transportation industry as an expert on parking policy and the economic and transport effects thereof" with the source being a link to a profile on a lobbyist's website with a POV that aligns strongly with Green Party policy. This is insufficient to support this claim. The profile looks like a summary profile that would be included in a consultant's proposal (perhaps from her employer). The fourth paragraph doesn't mention her, but promotes her former employer. The major relevant statement from this source is that she wrote a chapter in a book about climate change and transport, but that was not about parking policy and its economic effects (although it might have been mentioned, it hardly rates as expertise). She is a transportation planner by training, but there is no evidence that she is "recognised as an expert" in parking policy and its economic and transportation effects. She is not an economist by training. There are no sources of professional journals with articles written by her which may support the claim, nor are there any references to be found online about her work to suggest her expertise is cited by others (as may be expected to receive). Indeed the best that can be found is a paper from her previous employer, with her partner as one of the authors that mentions it was "motivated" by her. [1]

Given she is a public figure, and it is appropriate to provide scrutiny over claims of politicians about their expertise, it is proposed that the entry be edited to remove this. If a journal citation could be found (and applied) to provide better evidence, then it should be reversed and that citation applied.Libertyscott (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

Place of residence

edit

Due to a COI, I won't make substantive edits to this page. Paora, here's a source for the relocation to Wellington. Schwede66 17:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edit request

edit

User:MW691, I think that should say "plug-in hybrid" rather than simply "hybrid". Schwede66 13:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much, have done. I hadn't picked up on that in the sources, and until I read up on it just now I wouldn't have appreciated the distinction, so you've helped me learn something! MW691 (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

are considered part of Genter's Rongotai electorate; Andykatib, I suggest you remove the word "considered" from this sentence because this is a simple fact. Schwede66 07:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @Schwede66:, will go and change it. Andykatib (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply