Talk:Judd mat Gaardebounen

This article completely and I think deliberately omits, that “Judd” is actually the Luxemburgish word for “Jew”.

It’s a fact that “Jew” is what “Judd” literally means. And nobody in Luxemburg associates anything offensive with it, just as “Hamburger” isn’t offensive to people from Hamburg, now is it?
Anyone thinking it’s offensive should ask himself why his mind was the one who came up with that association.

To be frank, nobody in Luxemburg actually believes that very far-fetched theory about “judia”. It’s just something the officials think they have to say to “justify” it and be “politically correct”. But everyone, including them, generally thinks it probably started out as a kind of joke. It’s generally not taken very seriously, and there are similar little jokes going around as there are for mixing up the “Hamburger” people and food.

So take the whole thing with a huge shovel of salt. ;)
I consider the association to be more positive than negative. (I love those beans in that sauce! Best side dish ever. There’s never enough. :)

— 188.100.62.251 (talk) 08:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judd mat Gaardebounen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060209135630/http://www.luxembourg.co.uk/recipes.html to http://www.luxembourg.co.uk/recipes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Judd

The definition of this entry is clearly wrong. Should something be done? Javandy (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)