| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Berrios article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 91 days  |
 | Joseph Berrios has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Berrios/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
I wasn't planning on reviewing this, but since no one else at GAN seems to care and I'm already doing a copyright check on this article, might as well kill two birds with one stone. Wizardman 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hugh (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Going through all the references over the next 24-48 hours to check both for reliability and copyright issues. That'll be the crux of the review once that's finally done. I did some a while back so I've made progress already. Wizardman 01:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The copyright issues are now resolved. Here are the concerns I found in the article:
- The last ref is a deadlink; fix or remove.
Removed. Hugh (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- The personal life section would be better combined with the rest of the article. It's the type of article where having that extra section, especially with so little in it, seems pointless.
- Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is a one sentence paragraph in the article; combine it in so it's not hanging.
- Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- The lead it a little on the small side given the size of the article, though that's more personal preference than anything.
- Lead expanded. Hugh (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Article's now on hold, just make those fixes and I'll pass it. Wizardman 02:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Everything checks out, article now passes. Wizardman 14:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. Hugh (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)