Talk:Jordan Davies
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Flooded with them hundreds in topic Requested move 27 September 2018
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 27 September 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 18:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
– Only one with an article. Unreal7 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. "Only one with an article" – so what? The only reason for that seems to be that Jordan Davies (rugby) hasn't been written up yet. He has played professionally, and satisfies WP:NRU though perhaps not WP:RLN. Narky Blert (talk) 07:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CRYSTAL. Whether any other uses of the name are sufficiently notable to have an article and make this one not be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is unknown. For now, at least, the absence of any other articles with topics that use this name is extremely relevant - it makes this the ONLY USE on WP - therefore no need to disambiguate; there is nothing to disambiguate with! --В²C ☎ 18:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak support Per В²C, if the others when they are created get enough views, we can revisit even though Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Primary topic when a disambiguation page lists only one existing article by that name provides that the only blue link is not automatically primary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.