Talk:Jones College Prep High School

Untitled

I don't know how to make the picture appear on the right hand side of the page, I uploaded it but all that is visible is the link.--MPet 03:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikified, made it look nice. I hope you guys at Jones are doing good, I do miss my old friends from elementary school now. Mapletip 04:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks--MPet 23:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jones College Prep High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130407063803/http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/history.jsp to http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/history.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819024654/http://jonescollegeprep.org/mission_statement.jsp to http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/mission_statement.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919094756/http://jonescollegeprep.org/athletics.jsp to http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/athletics.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928040453/http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/awards.jsp to http://www.jonescollegeprep.org/awards.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603203843/http://jonescollegeprep.org/ to http://jonescollegeprep.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Updating Enrollment

Attempting to update enrollment numbers, but NCES does not have updated information for the 2018-2019 school year.

https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/school_detail.asp?Search=1&SchoolID=170993000990&ID=170993000990 -- Reports 1,815 students for 2017-18 year

Should we use this source in tandem with the 2017-18 data from City of Chicago's data portal? if we do, there's another conflict:

https://data.cityofchicago.org/Education/Chicago-Public-Schools-School-Profile-Information-/kh4r-387c/data -- Reports 1,918 students for 2017-2018 year

What should be put up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwelvePointFive (talk • contribs) 00:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

No one can edit the page at all now. There is no need to have the most up to date numbers. NCES is the standard source we use, and of course I have no objection to that. As I explained on your talk, this is an encyclopedia, by definition tertiary. Secondary sources are always preferred. Additionally, by using the same source across all school articles, it allows an even comparison to be drawn between schools. If you agree, and also state that you are the same editor as was edit warring from the IP, we can request protection be lifted. There is a suite of statistics that can and should be added from NCES. Thanks. Please sign your talk page posts. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 04:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I was the same editor from my IP. I was not aware of this secondary source process in place, I just saw a number was outdated so I went to the same source and updated it, thinking it would be a simple correction and that the source in use currently was fine. Now that at least I am aware of NCES we can use that from now on. TwelvePointFive (talk) 11:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

And you learned how to handle having edits reverted too, so win-win. I'll ping the protecting admin here in a few to get the protection lifted. If you need help ever, gimmie a hollar. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 12:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)