This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright review.
editResolved copyright issue
| ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@Johnpacklambert, Paris1127, Bearcat, and ChiGuy76: (and anyone else reading this) Avoiding copyright violations is not as simple as making sure that each sentence is rewritten in one's own words. One also has to be concerned about copying the structure (See Structure, sequence and organization for a specific discussion in the context of software, but the general concept applies.) For example, the second sentence of the personal life section reads:
A sentence in this site reads:
Not exactly the same words; editors might disagree whether this constitutes a violation of close paraphrasing or not. Were this the only sentence, it would probably not be flagged. However, if you examine the six consecutive sentences in the Wikipedia articles, and eight consecutive sentences in the source, it is clear that the same structure is carried over, and moderate rewriting of each sentence occurs, while maintaining exactly the same overall structure.
The same challenge exists with other sentences. I checked the main contributors to this article. On the one hand it is a case study in collaboration–about 50 individual editors, no one of which has more than 4 edits. The flip side is that no one of these editors might feel the personal responsibility to address the problem. There are only three editors with two or more edits in 2012 or 2013, several of which were minor edits. I'll send a note to them, hoping that someone will step up and work on a rewrite. It seems like an important enough article to salvage.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
|
New entry
editHe’s on criminal minds episode 6 season 16 for 2023 52.128.137.149 (talk) 03:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)