Talk:Jon Postel

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 83.86.193.229 in topic Personal Data

Comments

edit

Membership in the ACM isn't a particular distinction--it's a large organization, and easy to join. Did Postel do anything specific with/for ACM? Hold office, edit a journal? Vicki Rosenzweig

I agree, I removed this part. Marco d'Itri

Comments from Joe Bannister (joseph@isi.edu, ex director of div 7)

edit

Vicki's sentiment about Jon's ACM membership is correct, but I'll point out that he was the 1997 corecipient of the ACM Sigcomm Award, which is highly prestigious. Jon also received the 1998 ITU Silver Medal, the 1997 John C. Dvorak Award for Telecommunications Excellence, and (posthumously) the 1999 Jonathan B. Postel Service Award from ISOC.

Good point. These are now added. Johnh (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jon's death did follow heart-valve replacement surgery -- but by several (five or six) years. His unexpected death, however, was related to heart problems. To be pedantically precise, he died in Santa Monica, California, which is in the county (but not the city) of Los Angeles.

Thanks for your accurate and objective article. I miss Jon and am pleased to see him thus remembered.

Controversy about the root hijack

edit

I was surprised this para omitted his motivation. I guess it remains unclear.

We need some additional references to this event. I'd recommend:

Added last two sources for controversy aspect of the NTIA proposal --Lexein (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
After the recent addition of several sources, I've commented out the "furious Ira Magaziner" phrase, in favor of those sources. We may infer, as knowledgeable bearded old ones, that Mr. M. lost his shit, but until RS says so, we can't. Unfortunately, all the echoes of the article will take months, or years, to reflect this change. --Lexein (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Personal Data

edit

Birthplace? 193.145.150.119 (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't know, but it's not mentioned, so I added Category:Place of birth missing. Terraxos (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Date of photo? The article says he died in 1998, but on the photo, dated April 2008 he looks alive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.193.229 (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

What of /etc/services?

edit

I came to this page due to Jon Postel's name and eMail being plastered all over the port numbers in my file /etc/services. Is there some purpose in /etc/services having eMail addresses? Kd4ttc (talk) 04:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The email addresses aren't actually used by by internetworking protocols (they will be comments after the "#"). The purpose is to give the administrative contact for service port number assignments. Through most of the early genesis of the Internet, the port numbers were all assigned by Jon Postel, presumably he kept them all in a text file on his computer, and that's how the entire internet worked! It's a pretty amazing story actually. If you have more questions, you could ask them at our WP:Reference desk/Computing. Franamax (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

RFC's

edit

Actualized the number of RFC's from http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index2.html until the end of October 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakFree (talkcontribs) 21:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Criticism of "Postel's law"

edit

Perhaps there should be a criticism section. Might be hard to find sources, but applying Postel's law causes huge problems in many cases, for example Internet Explorer's allowance invalid HTML and Javascript lead to security flaws, and invalid code which then can't be run in other browsers. The modern approach is to be extremely strict about interpreting input, so the inputter is made immediately aware that they've done it wrong. 81.154.219.19 (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, there should not be such a section because a) this isn't the main article for Postel's Law and b) the main article already contains a criticism section. -- Jibal (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

Should the title of the page be his birth name and not his nick name? (Jonathan not Jon)

Davidgumberg (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jon Postel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Jon Postel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not editorialised at all.

edit

Yeah, not at all. - Myrnamyers (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply